From Planes to Fake Snow: Social Media’s Descent into Conspiracy Chaos

---

We’re transforming your reading experience by removing all ads and focusing on high-quality, in-depth geopolitical analysis. Enjoy a cleaner, more enjoyable news experience, free from distractions. Help us continue to provide exceptional content by donating today. Your support ensures we remain independent and reader-funded. Visit linktapgo.com/thedumshow to contribute. Thank you for making The DUM News better than ever! – Matt

---

---

tHe iNteRw3Bz – Social media has become the digital stage for some of the most absurd and mind-numbing conspiracy theories, where facts are disregarded, common sense takes a backseat, and logic is left gasping for air. In the race for likes, shares, and fleeting internet fame, we’ve traded intrigue for banality. Grand ideas of shadowy organizations orchestrating world events have devolved into theories so dull and unimaginative they might as well be parody.

Among the most laughable is the assertion that commercial airplanes are actually killer drones. According to these self-appointed truth-seekers, every jetliner in the sky is a government-controlled machine, monitoring or targeting civilians. Never mind the thousands of pilots, engineers, and air traffic controllers who would need to be part of such a scheme without a single whistleblower stepping forward. Videos of aircraft leaving contrails are rebranded as “evidence,” accompanied by ominous music and captions like, “They don’t want you to know.” The theories persist despite overwhelming evidence that drones, while widely used for surveillance and military operations, are not disguised as commercial aircraft. Investigations into “mysterious” drone sightings, such as those in New Jersey, have often concluded that the objects were simply misidentified planes, stars, or balloons. But the truth doesn’t drive engagement; paranoia does.

The fog conspiracy takes a similarly ridiculous turn. In some areas, people have reported strange smells and mild illnesses coinciding with fog, leading to allegations that it’s chemically engineered by the government. The theory has gained traction, with comparisons drawn to Operation Sea-Spray, a 1950s military experiment involving the release of bacteria over San Francisco to study biological warfare. While this historical reference provides a veneer of credibility, scientists have repeatedly debunked the modern fog conspiracy. Fog naturally forms under specific atmospheric conditions and can absorb pollutants, which might explain unusual odors or minor irritations. Yet, social media amplifies the narrative that “the fog isn’t just fog,” fueling distrust and fear rather than understanding.

Then there’s the infamous “fake snow” theory, which resurfaces every winter. Viral videos show people holding lighters to snowballs and declaring that the snow is synthetic because it doesn’t melt or drips black liquid. The reality is far less dramatic. When snow is exposed to a flame, it undergoes sublimation, transitioning directly from solid to vapor without becoming liquid. The black residue is soot from the lighter, a basic chemical reaction that anyone with a high school education should recognize. But why let basic science get in the way of a good social media post? These videos spread like wildfire, racking up millions of views and sparking debates that shouldn’t exist in the first place.

The laziness of these theories is staggering. In the past, conspiracy theories at least required some imagination. Tales of secret moon bases, underground alien civilizations, or interdimensional portals captured the collective curiosity. Now we’re left with, “Your weather is fake, and so is your snow.” The creativity is gone, replaced by a low-effort stream of paranoia aimed at people who mistake sensationalism for truth.

This brings us to the hypothetical next level of absurdity: the government turning off the sun at night to recharge its batteries. While this theory hasn’t gained traction yet, it’s almost inevitable given the current trajectory of social media’s conspiracy culture. Imagine the viral posts: grainy footage of a sunset accompanied by captions like, “The sun doesn’t set—it powers down!” Comments would range from “Wake up, sheeple!” to “It’s all part of the 5G agenda.” As absurd as it sounds, such a theory perfectly encapsulates the trend of attributing nefarious intent to phenomena that are entirely natural and easily explained.

The proliferation of these mundane and easily debunked theories isn’t just a harmless quirk of the internet. It has real consequences. When people waste their energy debating whether snow is fake, they’re distracted from legitimate issues that deserve attention. This phenomenon creates a cultural environment where skepticism is misapplied. Instead of questioning corporate monopolies, healthcare inequities, or government overspending, people obsess over fabricated threats.

The drone conspiracy, for instance, distracts from real concerns about drone technology. Unmanned aerial vehicles are increasingly used for surveillance, raising valid questions about privacy and the potential for abuse. But these discussions are drowned out by baseless claims about commercial planes being secret weapons. Similarly, the fixation on fog and snow as government experiments obscures genuine environmental issues. Fog can absorb pollutants, yes, but the solution isn’t to blame it on a conspiracy—it’s to address the pollution itself.

Social media platforms bear much of the blame for this mess. Their algorithms prioritize engagement over accuracy, promoting sensational content that keeps users scrolling. The more outrageous the claim, the more it spreads, creating echo chambers where misinformation thrives. Critical thinking is not only optional; it’s actively discouraged. After all, why fact-check when a 15-second video can make you feel like you’ve uncovered the “truth”?

This environment fosters a culture of distrust that erodes public confidence in institutions and science. When every phenomenon becomes a potential conspiracy, it becomes increasingly difficult to address real-world problems. Climate change, public health initiatives, and even infrastructure projects are met with suspicion, not because the evidence isn’t there, but because the public discourse has been poisoned by years of baseless theorizing.

Ironically, the same platforms that amplify nonsense also contain voices calling for reason and critical thinking. Scientists, educators, and skeptics tirelessly debunk these claims, but their efforts often feel like shouting into the void. For every video explaining sublimation, there are ten more proclaiming that the snow is fake. For every thread dissecting the science of fog, there’s a meme suggesting it’s part of a global mind-control plot. The battle for public understanding is uphill, but it’s one that must be fought.

So, what can be done? For starters, individuals must take responsibility for their own media consumption. It’s not enough to scroll passively; we must actively question the sources of information we encounter. Before sharing a viral video or retweeting a sensational claim, consider whether it’s supported by evidence. Seek out credible experts and reputable publications. And most importantly, don’t confuse popularity with truth.

At the societal level, there’s a need for better education in media literacy and critical thinking. Schools should teach students how to evaluate sources, recognize logical fallacies, and distinguish between fact and opinion. This isn’t about stifling curiosity or skepticism—it’s about equipping people with the tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex information landscape.

Finally, social media platforms must take a more active role in curbing misinformation. This doesn’t mean censorship, but it does mean promoting transparency and accountability. Algorithms should prioritize content that informs rather than inflames. Fact-checking initiatives should be expanded and made more visible. And users should be encouraged to engage with diverse perspectives rather than retreating into ideological silos.

The internet is a powerful tool for sharing knowledge and fostering dialogue, but it’s also a breeding ground for the obnoxious dunderheads of social media. From killer drones that were planes to fog that was fog and snow that was snow, the conspiracy theories we encounter today are a pale shadow of what they once were. They’re lazy, mundane, and often outright laughable. But they’re also a symptom of a deeper problem: a society that has lost its ability to separate fact from fiction. If we want to reclaim the narrative, we must confront these absurdities head-on, armed with logic, evidence, and just a little bit of humor. And when the day comes that someone claims the sun needs to recharge its batteries at night, we’ll be ready.