Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, Left’s Hypocrisy Exposed

---

We’re transforming your reading experience by removing all ads and focusing on high-quality, in-depth geopolitical analysis. Enjoy a cleaner, more enjoyable news experience, free from distractions. Help us continue to provide exceptional content by donating today. Your support ensures we remain independent and reader-funded. Visit linktapgo.com/thedumshow to contribute. Thank you for making The DUM News better than ever! – Matt

---

The nomination of Matt Gaetz as Attorney General by Donald Trump has predictably sparked an uproar from the left, a reaction that highlights their persistent hypocrisy. This is especially evident when comparing their outrage over Gaetz to their defense—or outright glorification—of controversial figures from their own political history. While they question Gaetz’s qualifications and character, they conveniently ignore similar or worse issues in the records of their own icons.

Take Robert F. Kennedy, appointed Attorney General by his brother, John F. Kennedy. RFK had no substantial legal or prosecutorial experience prior to his appointment. His qualifications were rooted in his family name and loyalty to JFK, not in a history of enforcing or interpreting the law. The same voices now decrying lack of experience in government appointments were silent then. They celebrated RFK’s tenure while ignoring the blatant nepotism it represented. Gaetz, by contrast, has a proven track record as a legislator, a strong legal background, and a history of standing firm under fire. The outrage over his nomination is not based on his abilities but on partisan disdain for his political alignment and style.

The left’s selective memory extends to their own controversial appointments. Janet Reno, appointed by Bill Clinton, was at the center of one of the most infamous government actions in modern American history: Ruby Ridge. Under Reno’s watch, federal agents engaged in a deadly standoff with Randy Weaver’s family, resulting in the deaths of Weaver’s wife and son. This tragedy highlighted the dangers of unchecked government power and poor decision-making at the highest levels of law enforcement. Yet Reno was shielded from the level of scrutiny Gaetz faces, largely because her actions aligned with the left’s broader narrative of authority over dissent.

Jeff Sessions, appointed by Trump in his first term, offers another example of misplaced trust. Sessions, a creature of the Washington establishment, recused himself from overseeing the Russia investigation early in Trump’s presidency, leaving the president exposed to the politically motivated attacks of the Mueller probe. The recusal was not just an abdication of responsibility but a betrayal of the administration’s ability to defend itself against baseless claims. Gaetz, in stark contrast, has demonstrated an unwavering loyalty to Trump through years of partisan witch hunts, standing firm against the manufactured scandals that plagued the administration.

Eric Holder, another darling of the left, presided over the infamous “Fast and Furious” operation, a botched gun-running scheme that armed Mexican cartels. Holder, who openly referred to himself as Obama’s “wingman,” embodied partisanship in the role of Attorney General. His tenure was marked by scandal and corruption, yet he remained a celebrated figure on the left. The same people who cheered Holder’s loyalty to Obama now criticize Gaetz for his steadfast defense of Trump, painting his commitment as dangerous rather than principled.

Loretta Lynch, Holder’s successor, was no stranger to controversy herself. Her secret tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton during the height of the Hillary Clinton email investigation raised serious ethical concerns about the impartiality of the Justice Department. Despite the obvious impropriety, Lynch faced minimal consequences, and the left dismissed the incident as a non-issue. Yet they cast Gaetz as a threat to the integrity of the Justice Department, ignoring their own history of appointing attorneys general with glaring ethical lapses.

The attacks on Gaetz’s character are equally hypocritical. The left has seized on false and disproven allegations to smear his reputation, despite both the FBI and DOJ clearing him of any wrongdoing. These accusations, though baseless, continue to serve as talking points for his detractors. Gaetz’s brash style and willingness to challenge the status quo make him an easy target, but they also make him uniquely qualified for the role of Attorney General. He has consistently shown a willingness to confront corruption and defend the principles of law and order, even when it puts him at odds with his own party.

His ouster of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House is a prime example of his uncompromising approach to governance. While critics painted the move as reckless, it was a necessary step to challenge the entrenched establishment and demand accountability from leadership. Gaetz’s actions demonstrate a commitment to principle over politics, a trait sorely needed in the role of Attorney General.

Gaetz’s loyalty to Trump is another critical factor in his nomination. Through years of relentless attacks, Gaetz stood by Trump, defending him against a barrage of hoaxes and manufactured scandals. The “Russia Collusion” hoax, which culminated in a baseless impeachment, was one of the most egregious examples of political weaponization of the justice system. Funded by the Clinton campaign and perpetuated by a complicit media, the Steele dossier was a sham from the start, yet it was used to undermine Trump’s presidency. Gaetz was among the few voices willing to call out the corruption and defend the truth.

The “Fine People” hoax is another example. The media repeatedly misrepresented Trump’s remarks following the Charlottesville rally, falsely claiming he referred to neo-Nazis as “very fine people.” In reality, Trump explicitly condemned white supremacists and was referring to peaceful protesters on both sides of the debate over Confederate statues. Gaetz’s support for Trump during this manufactured outrage was a testament to his commitment to truth over narrative.

Similarly, the “Drinking Bleach” hoax and the “Suckers and Losers” hoax were baseless claims designed to tarnish Trump’s reputation. In both cases, the media twisted Trump’s words and actions to fit their agenda, ignoring the context and facts. Gaetz consistently pushed back against these lies, demonstrating a clear understanding of the stakes involved in defending the presidency from partisan attacks.

The “Project 2025” hoax and the “End of Democracy” hoax are further examples of the left’s willingness to distort reality to suit their narrative. These baseless claims sought to paint Trump as a threat to the republic, despite his policies and actions being aimed at strengthening American institutions. Gaetz’s vocal defense of Trump during these attacks highlighted his ability to see through the noise and focus on the truth.

Critics argue that Gaetz’s style is too abrasive, that he lacks the decorum expected of an Attorney General. But this criticism misses the point. The role of Attorney General is not to appease the media or conform to the expectations of the Washington establishment. It is to enforce the law and protect the Constitution. Gaetz’s willingness to challenge the status quo and take on the entrenched bureaucracy makes him uniquely suited for the position. His nomination represents a departure from the swamp creatures and partisan hacks who have occupied the role in the past.

The left’s attacks on Gaetz are not about his qualifications or his record. They are about their fear of a Justice Department that will not bow to their political agenda. They are about their fear of a gatekeeper who will defend the presidency from the lawfare and corruption that have become staples of modern politics. Gaetz is not perfect, but perfection is not the standard. Integrity, loyalty, and a commitment to justice are, and Gaetz has demonstrated all three.

The president enforces the law, and the Attorney General is the gatekeeper of the presidency. With Gaetz in the role, the Justice Department has a chance to restore its integrity and focus on its true mission: upholding the law without fear or favor. The time for playing politics with the nation’s justice system is over. Matt Gaetz’s nomination is a step toward ensuring that justice is not just a word but a principle, upheld for all Americans. It’s time to confirm him.