As I sit here, reflecting on the events surrounding the Donald Trump hush money case, I can’t help but feel a deep sense of betrayal and disillusionment. No matter what the jury ultimately decides, it’s clear to me that a gross dereliction and mockery of our judicial system has taken place. The actions and decisions surrounding this case have exposed a series of alarming flaws that should concern every American who values justice and fairness.
|
At the heart of this case is Michael Cohen, a man whose credibility is as flimsy as a house of cards. Cohen, a former lawyer for Trump, has been caught in a web of lies. He initially testified under oath that he had made payments to Stormy Daniels on his own accord, only to later change his story and implicate Trump. This flip-flopping is not just suspicious; it’s a blatant attempt to manipulate the legal process for personal gain. How can we trust a judicial system that relies on the testimony of a proven liar?
It’s not just Cohen’s deceit that troubles me. The federal and state governments have also played a shameful role in this travesty. Initially, both the federal and state prosecutors declined to bring charges against Trump, citing insufficient evidence and expired statutes of limitations. Yet, suddenly, these very same charges have been resurrected, not because new evidence has emerged, but because of a change in political winds. This selective prosecution is a dangerous precedent that undermines the rule of law and suggests that justice can be manipulated to serve political ends.
The imposition of a gag order on Trump is another disturbing aspect of this case. Restricting his ability to speak freely about the charges against him is a clear violation of his First Amendment rights. This gag order not only stifles his voice but also sends a chilling message to anyone who dares to speak out against the establishment. In a country that prides itself on freedom of speech, this is an unacceptable infringement on fundamental rights.
One of the most outrageous decisions in this case has been the accumulation of all three charges into a single decision. This unprecedented move is not just legally questionable; it also reeks of an attempt to overwhelm the defense and sway the jury. By combining these charges, the prosecution is trying to create a narrative of overwhelming guilt, even when each charge on its own may not hold up under scrutiny. This tactic is a gross abuse of prosecutorial power and a direct assault on the principle of a fair trial.
Adding to this list of atrocities is the fact that the statute of limitations for these charges has expired. The legal system has specific time limits for bringing charges to ensure that cases are tried when evidence is fresh and reliable. Ignoring these time limits to pursue a political agenda is a blatant disregard for the legal safeguards that protect us all. It’s a clear indication that this case is more about political vendetta than justice.
Alvin Bragg’s decision to escalate misdemeanors to felonies is another glaring example of judicial overreach. This escalation is not based on new evidence or legal precedent but on a desire to inflict maximum damage. By turning minor infractions into serious crimes, Bragg is distorting the legal process to achieve a predetermined outcome. This manipulation of charges is a dangerous tactic that threatens the integrity of our judicial system.
All these actions point to a disturbing reality: the Biden administration and the courts are complicit in turning our legal system into a tool for political retribution. This case is not about justice; it’s about sending a message that no one is safe from political persecution. It’s a sad day to be an American when our institutions of justice are used to settle political scores rather than uphold the law.
As I reflect on these events, I am deeply concerned for the future of our country. The principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law are the foundation of our country. When these principles are compromised, we all suffer. The Trump hush money case is a stark reminder that our judicial system is vulnerable to manipulation and abuse. It’s up to us, as citizens, to demand accountability and to fight for the integrity of our legal institutions. We must not allow political agendas to erode the bedrock of our republic. This case is a call to action for all of us to stand up for justice and to ensure that our legal system remains fair and impartial. Ask yourself what you can do and do it fervently and with haste… because we are running out of time.
“The Don’t Unfriend Me Show” explores a broad range of political themes, from satire to serious topics, with Matt Speer, a Navy Intel veteran, husband, and father, leading the show. Matt shares his views to stimulate constructive discussions. The show aims to provide a balanced perspective on complex issues, welcoming participants of all political affiliations to share their unique viewpoints.
I hope Donald Trump continues to find strength enough to “Restrain The Kracken”.
I too have the same serious concerns about this court proceeding. All of the thoughts by the author are very valid and well made.
However, if a man like Trump, who has the resources (money), courage, and the temerity to stand against the evil forces at play here, I’m not sure what that means for the average American. I have the courage and probably the temerity to stand, but I in no manner have the resources to spend as Trump is doing. I salute him for spending his money this way, and hope, against all hope, that he is triumphant over this suit as well as the others thrown at him. If I were caught in this situation, I would just have to surrender to the Deep State and spend the rest of my life in jail. For me this would be a hopeless situation.
That brings me to the same worries that the author has: when the principles upon which we base our “justice” system are hijacked for political purposes, I fear, along with the author and every other person with a brain that functions (I discount many politicians and people who suffer from TDS have brains that are fully connected where all the neurons fire correctly and are connected to each other as the Lord designed when He made us) that we have allowed our system to be dominated by left wing politicians and bureaucrats for their own benefit, and are thus subject to the direction that the wind happens to be blowing at the time.
I agree that we need to stand up and say no to this nonsense. That will require all of us to accept a great deal of risk. We may be subjected to the Deep State’s powers, which I fear will be very ugly to our sense of security and comfort. However, IF WE DON’T DO THIS, WE ARE NOT A FREE COUNTRY ANY LONGER!! We need to consider how to make these changes. If the left prevails in the November elections, and we continue down this same road, we will see our country become very tyrannical and we will lose the few freedoms that we can still claim. Shades of Gestapo Germany come to mind with the Stasi and all the other evil that existed in that era.
It is my prayer daily for the people of this country that they can see the reality of where we are headed under this administration (and the next if the left has its way), and choose to elect people who will guide us in a path that returns us to liberty and freedom. We lost MANY of our LIBERTIES and FREEDOMS starting about 100 years ago. We traded our ‘LIBERTY FOR SECURITY” and the promises of LBJ and his ‘GREAT SOCIETY’, which was nothing more that the first steps to SOCIALISM in its many facets. It has only become more and more tyrannical in the times since then under every president (with the exception of Ronald Reagan), regardless of the party affiliation. We can reverse this, but it will require great sacrifice from the patriots left in this country. Are you one of them? Or are you too lazy and comfortable to stand up and SHOUT NOOO!
When the caravan turns, the last becomes the first. This Swamp must be drained, otherwise it will swallow any of us, as it is trying to swallow Trump. Victory to you, great warrior – Donald Trump!
DONALD TRUMP: VICTIM OF HIS OWN SEDITION
The Constitution’s jury system is not only completely unbiblical, it’s a crap’s game when it comes to any kind of justice, especially in any court today representing the biblically egregious Constitutional Republic.
When inaugurated as President, Trump swore allegiance to the biblically seditious Constitution as the law of the land and, thus, its unbiblical, capricious jury system as well. He’s now a victim of the same.
“…Article 3’s provision for juries is yet another instance of the framers’ deciding they knew better than Yahweh. The Bible offers nothing that resembles a jury system….
“Most Constitutionalists favor the jury system, provided jury nullification (a juror’s right to judge a law as unjust, oppressive, or inapplicable to any particular case) is in force. However, even if jury nullification were restored, juries would still render decisions based upon each jury’s collective standard of morality or immorality. “A jury drawn from the [Biblically] uninstructed population is no better equipped to administer the just requirements of God’s law than a corrupt judge.”35…. Although it might be argued that it only takes one juror to dissent and prevent a “railroad job,” most people lack the independence and resolution to resist the will of a majority. More often than not, today’s jurors reflect the type of people we are warned against in Exodus 23:
‘Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment.’ (Exodus 23:2)
“Juries produce, at best, erratic justice. Without Yahweh’s law as the standard, jury decisions are based upon the capricious morality of its members. Nothing demonstrates this better than Jesus’ trial by a jury of His peers with Pontius Pilate presiding. The prevailing immorality of the day demanded Jesus be crucified even though He was clearly innocent….
“The constitutional right of a trial by a jury of “impartial” peers is regarded by Americans – especially Christian Constitutionalists – as one of the last bulwarks against tyranny. If this is true, Yahweh (who is unquestionably a God of justice and liberty) would have included juries somewhere in His perfect law and righteous judgments. Surely, one of the reasons He did not provide for them is that juries (like elections) place government policy and juridical determinations in the hands of an unpredictable and unequally yoked public, the majority of whom are not Christian (Matthew 7:13)….”
For more, see Chapter 6 “Article 3: Judicial Usurpation” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at bible versus constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 6.
Then Chapter 15 “Amendment 6: Speedy Trials, Public Trials, and Impartial Juries.”
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of “BL vs. USC.”