Comprehensive Study on 99 Million COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Unveils Slight Increase in Medical Risks

A landmark study encompassing 99 million COVID-19 vaccine recipients has revealed a marginal increase in the risk of developing blood, heart, and brain-related medical conditions. This extensive research, undertaken by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project and disseminated through the journal Vaccine, marks a significant milestone in understanding the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines developed by Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca.

Global Vaccine Data Network co-director Dr Helen Petousis-Harris: Latest study uses vast data sets to ensure vaccine safety.

The study meticulously verified previously identified safety concerns such as myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), pericarditis (inflammation of the lining around the heart), Guillain-Barré syndrome (a rare neurological disorder), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (a type of blood clot in the brain). For instance, individuals vaccinated with AstraZeneca’s shot exhibited a 2.5-fold increased likelihood of developing Guillain-Barre syndrome.

The researchers underscored the importance of their findings, stating, “While our study confirmed previously identified rare safety signals following COVID-19 vaccination and contributed evidence on several other important outcomes, further investigation is warranted to confirm associations and assess clinical significance.” This acknowledgment highlights the necessity for ongoing research to fully comprehend the implications of these associations.

Coverage of the study varied notably across the media landscape, with center- and right-leaning outlets prominently featuring the findings. In contrast, left-leaning sources, aside from Bloomberg, exhibited less interest in reporting on the study. This disparity in coverage reflects the broader polarization surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine and its side effects, with left-leaning individuals traditionally displaying less skepticism towards the vaccine.

“By making the data dashboards publicly available, we are able to support greater transparency, and stronger communications to the health sector and public.” Associate Professor Helen Petousis-Harris Co-Director, Global Vaccine Data Network hosted at University of Auckland

The Global Vaccine Data Network’s analysis revealed slight increases in neurological, blood, and heart-related conditions post-vaccination. Notably, myocarditis cases were observed following the first, second, and third doses of mRNA vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. Additionally, a heightened risk of pericarditis was identified in individuals receiving AstraZeneca’s vaccine, and an increased likelihood of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was associated with viral-vector vaccines like AstraZeneca’s.

The Global Vaccine Data Network’s study represents a critical milestone in our understanding of COVID-19 vaccine safety, bringing to light the rare but real risks associated with vaccination.

Despite these findings, more than 13.5 billion doses have been administered globally, with a relatively small fraction of recipients experiencing adverse effects. This has sparked a nuanced debate over the vaccines’ benefits versus their risks. Lead author Kristýna Faksová emphasized the study’s capacity to identify rare safety signals due to its large sample size, highlighting the importance of such comprehensive research in vaccine safety monitoring.

Experts not involved in the study have reiterated the overarching benefit of vaccination. Jacob Glanville, CEO of Centivaix, and Dr. Marc Siegel, a clinical professor of medicine, both stressed that the risk of adverse events from COVID-19 itself far outweighs the potential side effects of the vaccine. They advocate for a balanced view that weighs the vaccines’ side effects against the risks posed by the virus, especially in high-risk groups.

This detailed study, along with the ensuing conversations, underscores the intricacies of vaccine safety and emphasizes the importance of measured scientific research and open dialogue. Acknowledging the uncommon risks tied to COVID-19 vaccines is essential, but it’s equally important to view them within the larger framework of their effectiveness in preventing serious complications from the virus. Deciding to get vaccinated should not be a political choice but rather one grounded in data, science, and respect for individual freedoms to determine what is best. Making informed personal decisions, guided by data such as that presented in this article, is crucial.

**The DUM Show News Site ensures all COVID-19 content is based on scientifically supported evidence and reputable sources. We cite these sources for transparency and encourage readers to explore them. As scientific understanding evolves, so will our content to reflect the latest insights. Our goal is to provide reliable information that supports public health and combats misinformation.

Sources:
“99 million people included in largest global vaccine safety study,” authored by Global Vaccine Data Network hosted at University of Auckland, published on February 19, 2024, on the website “Health and medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences,” with the URL: https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2024/02/19/99million-people-in-largest-global-vaccine-study.html

“Largest Covid Vaccine Study Yet Finds Links to Health Conditions,” authored by By Jason Gale February 18, 2024 at 9:29 PM EST, on the website “Bloomberg,” with the URL: https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2024/02/19/99million-people-in-largest-global-vaccine-study.html

18 thoughts on “Comprehensive Study on 99 Million COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Unveils Slight Increase in Medical Risks

  1. Gee, that’s too bad. When all these people start dying out, suddenly and unexpectedly, you just know the Dr’s aren’t going to tell the truth that it was the vaccine. They’ll pick up their left-wing brownie points by lying, or saying it was Trump’s fault!!!

    1. Most of us conservatives won’t care about the lies that will be recorded about the cause of death just so as long it’s the leftist LIE-berals who are dying off.

    2. Absolutely correct. “Doctors” are liars and stooges for the medical industry, which has NO other desire than to advance the agenda of the left. They are owned by the government They enjoy seeing people die by their hands. They also get huge bonus money for killing off those over the age of 65. Worse than prostitutes, worse than Josef Mengale.

  2. The good thing is the schools didn’t make this mandatory. Forcing kids to take a vaccine for a virus that has little to no effect on kids is just stupid.

  3. 99 million people out of 13.5 billion is a small percentage. It’s still 100 million people. The left is still protecting big pharma and probably some rinos, on the vaccine that really did nothing to stop or ease symptoms. The pharmaceutical industry made billions which allowed them to turn around and finance democrats elections and line pockets.

    1. A small percentage of what? Where did you get 13.5 billion? There are 8.5 billion people on Earth.

    2. I don’t know what the figure 13.5 Billion has to do with any measure of contrast. The Earth’s population is somewhere in the neighborhood of 8.5 Billion. Granted, the figure 99 Million is still small by comparison but I believe is still inflated beyond the true reality of COVID 19 deaths. Considering that in the USA alone, there are usually millions of cases of influenza annually and there were only 1,300 – 1,400 confirmed cases of flu in 2022, this proves that the PCR test used to diagnose COVID 19 cannot differentiate between different SARS viruses . . . like the flu and the common cold.

  4. This should not come as surprise to anyone of think so,considering when anitially started the THREE BIG PHARMAS were were offer immunity from LIABILITY for lawsuit suing. BIG RED FLAG considering this was supposively new virus.

  5. I would call more young athletes dying between 2020 and 2023 than died between 1970 and 2020 more than a ‘slight increase’.

  6. (I would like for my comments to stay UP, please!) “I would call more young athletes dying between 2020 and 2023 than died between 1970 and 2020 more than a ‘slight increase’. “

  7. Until there is a study that shows the effectiveness/risk of early intervention with drugs like HQC and Ivermectin (or even vitamins) so folks can compare effectiveness/risk data on the two strategies for handling covid outbreaks, there is no way to fight the vaccine tyrants. They will still continue to tout the “minor” rate of adverse reactions and just do the same stupid thing when it happens again. Death is not minor if you or a family member is the victim of blood clot induced strokes or myocarditis induced heart failure. The other issue that needs way more analysis is the adverse vaccine affects on population groups that were not at serious risk when contracting covid. To this date, nobody really has the data to make informed consent.

  8. “Acknowledging the uncommon risks tied to COVID-19 vaccines is essential, but it’s equally important to view them within the larger framework of their effectiveness in preventing serious complications from the virus.” Really? The use of HCQ and Ivermectin were used successfully all over the world, except where the death jab advocates were successful in getting their use practically banned. Especially in the instance of Ivermectin, there were NO long term effects, as well as no serious complications for those who were infected, but they can still try to push their faulty and deadly narrative. The majority of us aren’t buying it, but those who still do, by all means, go get your umpteenth booster and catch your umpteenth Covid infection. The herd does definitely need thinned out!

  9. There is little doubt in my mind that you will find that The Global Vaccine Data Network is funded indirectly or secretly by Big Pharma as its study only confirms what they have been saying from the beginning that there is only slight risks in getting the covid shots despite the fact that there are reputable scientists saying that the worldwide death toll from the shots is stands at a minimum 17 million dead and undetermined number of hundreds of millions with serious adverse reactions.

  10. GVDN is funded by the Gates Foundation. That’s all you need to know…it’s BS. The jab is poison.

  11. When the COVID shot was mandatory for everyone except politicians and their employees that’s when you think maybe this isn’t the right thing for me and my family. I didn’t fall for all the hype and being pushed into something I didn’t need!! So when all the people start dying because of this my family will survive. Just remember who mandated this shot and when your family starts dying because of it sue the dictators who pushed it!!! The drs said the side effects out weigh the consequences, I’ll take covid over DEATH!!

  12. Matthew Speer, the only stat you referenced in this article cited a 250% increase! Explain to me how that is “slight”.
    Also, there is data that is showing unvaccinated blood transfusion recipients who get blood from a vaccinated donor are having symptoms exactly like those of the vaccinated. The inventor of MRNA is on record saying he would never inject it into a human.

    1. Pretty simple, I cited the source. This isn’t an editorial, my stance on the vaccine is well documented on my show, but this is a report of what was disclosed. The reader can decide if they find it credible or not. Thanks for asking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *