How a Pre-Election Strike by China Could Reshape Biden’s Re-election Bid

IN A POSSIBLE FUTURE – As the autumn season approaches with its palette of red and gold in just a few months, the global stage is similarly undergoing a dramatic transformation, fraught with instability and tension. As a political analyst, and a former Intelligence Specialist in the USN, I’m glued to the unfolding developments, keenly aware that each could significantly influence the upcoming U.S. presidential election. Three and a half years ago, I made a daring forecast: the only scenario in which Biden could secure re-election would be the onset of a global conflict, as historical precedents show that such crises have often bolstered the prospects of struggling presidents. So, please join me as we delve into this potentially destined and highly likely future scenario.

It’s late September, and as the U.S. presidential election looms, President Joe Biden faces a multifaceted challenge. Internationally, the atmosphere is charged with potential conflicts and diplomatic crises, and domestically, Biden is grappling with unfavorable poll numbers.

In the Middle East, Israel finds itself at the heart of escalating regional tensions, creating a volatile environment that could impact global alliances. In Eastern Europe, the stability of Ukraine is once again under threat, with rumors of potential collapse in Kiev signaling a possible resurgence of broader conflict. Farther east, the Korean Peninsula is experiencing renewed strains as North Korea intensifies its missile testing, aggravating its already fraught relationship with South Korea. Meanwhile, the historic rivalry between India and Pakistan is being exacerbated by their proxy wars in Afghanistan, adding another layer of complexity to the global geopolitical puzzle.

Within this global context, the Taiwan Strait emerges as a critical flashpoint. Despite the official U.S. stance under the Biden administration, which aligns with the “One China” policy that does not recognize Taiwan as a separate state, the island remains a symbol of freedom and prosperity in the region. Should China choose this moment to assert its claim over Taiwan, the implications for global politics and U.S. foreign policy would be profound.

This scenario could inadvertently benefit President Biden, not through deliberate actions of his administration, but through its perceived inaction. The concept of rallying around the flag, where citizens support their government more in times of international crises, could play a pivotal role here. A focus on a foreign threat could overshadow domestic discontent and Biden’s lagging approval ratings, shifting public attention and potentially bolstering his standing in the polls.

Historically, incumbent leaders in the U.S. have often seen their popularity surge during international crises. For instance, President George W. Bush’s approval ratings skyrocketed after the September 11 attacks due to the nationalistic fervor and unity that followed. Similarly, during the 1982 Falklands War, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s initially low popularity improved dramatically as the public rallied behind her leadership during the conflict.

FBI Director Warns of China Attacking USA Citizens by Cyber

In the current scenario, if China were to move against Taiwan, the crisis could serve as a distraction from domestic issues plaguing the Biden administration, such as economic challenges or social unrest. The administration’s recent legislative actions, such as pushing for the sale of Chinese-owned TikTok and bolstering Taiwan’s defenses, might then be viewed as anticipatory and strategic, despite previous criticisms.

In Israel, the increasing hostilities could not only destabilize the region but also compel the U.S. to reevaluate its strategic commitments and military presence in the Middle East, influencing global oil markets and economic stability. Similarly, the situation in Ukraine presents a stark reminder of the persistent threats to European security and the potential for a renewed refugee crisis, which would demand significant diplomatic and humanitarian responses.

On the Korean Peninsula, North Korea’s missile tests serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in Asia. Each missile launch by Pyongyang escalates the stakes, compelling the U.S. and its allies to bolster defense mechanisms and engage in precarious diplomatic negotiations that could sway public opinion back home.

The India-Pakistan conflict, fueled by their engagements in Afghanistan, highlights the complexities of South Asian security dynamics. This not only affects regional stability but also poses questions about nuclear security and the future of U.S. involvement in the region.

FBI Director Christopher Wray’s warnings about Chinese cyber threats take on new significance in this complex international environment. If Chinese hackers were to exploit the vulnerabilities in U.S. infrastructure amidst a crisis involving Taiwan, the impact could be catastrophic, particularly if critical systems like the national power grid were compromised. This scenario would likely lead to increased governmental control over private and corporate data, ostensibly for national security reasons, raising significant concerns about privacy and civil liberties.

These developments could lead to a situation where the Biden administration, while seemingly inactive on the foreign policy front, actually benefits electorally from the unfolding international crises. The administration’s focus on these threats, whether real or perceived, could divert public attention from Biden’s domestic policy failures or shortcomings, presenting him as a stable leader in turbulent times.

As these scenarios unfold, the American public must navigate the complexities of global politics and its direct impact on national stability and democratic values.

A Look Back: Houthis Hijack Vessel in Middle East

Understanding the interplay between domestic politics and international relations becomes crucial. Voters must discern between genuine security concerns and strategic political maneuvering, all while considering the long-term implications for U.S. foreign policy and civil liberties.

The 2020s have proven to be a decade of unprecedented challenges and changes. As we move closer to the U.S. presidential election, the ability of the electorate to analyze and respond to these developments will be pivotal. In this context, the unfolding international dramas are not just distant geopolitical events but are intimately connected to the domestic political landscape and the choices that American voters will make at the polls. This isn’t just about choosing a leader; it’s about understanding the broader global context in which these elections occur, shaping the future not only of the United States but of the world at large.